Thursday, June 30, 2011

rick ross shirtless

images Is Rick Ross sexy to you? rick ross shirtless. Rick Ross amp; Nike
  • Rick Ross amp; Nike


  • vjkypally
    05-19 11:08 PM
    Just Donated 25 dollars. I don't see Donor status. Does it take time?




    wallpaper Rick Ross amp; Nike rick ross shirtless. Famously fat, Rick Ross
  • Famously fat, Rick Ross


  • m306m
    05-01 01:18 PM
    Please see this thread

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=17306




    rick ross shirtless. hey now, Rick Ross! brad
  • hey now, Rick Ross! brad


  • at0474
    03-26 11:19 AM
    Are we sure that there are around 5-6k EB3 pending in the years 2002 and 2003. If thats true then it will take atleast 6 more years to process all the EB3's for 2002 and 2003 :(

    --But I am hoping there would be a spill over in june/july. That should give some extra numbers. But who knows...




    2011 Famously fat, Rick Ross rick ross shirtless. Rick Ross decided it was
  • Rick Ross decided it was


  • unitednations
    08-26 03:15 PM
    There were so many rejected L1 Individual petitions filed by TCS/Infy/Wipro etc.. These big companies will include all the internal tools in the resumes and INS asked for the purchase orders for all the specialised tools.

    As there were no PO's for those tools, petitions were rejected in large numbers. This has started in the last year and continuing... i personally have lot of friends whose petitions were rejected and went back to India..

    I also know a few people from these companies. Remember when the senators/congressmen sent the letters asking for explanation of how they are using h-1/l-1. Companies responded with the biggest bull---- answers.

    Now they are seeing what happens when you don't take serious when government representatives ask you things. Unfortunately; they are being picked on but everyone else is becoming collateral damage.



    more...

    rick ross shirtless. Rick Ross Vs. Rick Ross
  • Rick Ross Vs. Rick Ross


  • knnmbd
    05-03 03:53 PM
    Thanks bkarnik,
    Does it mean those who PD is not current can pay more and file for AOS or those who pay more get faster adjudication?
    --MC
    Only if PD is current!!!




    rick ross shirtless. Check out this new Rick Ross
  • Check out this new Rick Ross


  • intheyan
    08-12 02:30 PM
    Is it a mandatory process to do a walk in for ADIT processing or is it ok to wait for a while to receive the physical Green card? Again thanks in advance for your valuable replies

    That helps a lot.
    Here is some more information I got from murthy's forum.

    http://murthyforum.atinfopop.com/4/OpenTopic?a=tpc&s=1024039761&f=1474093861&m=1201040261



    more...

    rick ross shirtless. Rick Ross Is Shirtless (AGAIN!
  • Rick Ross Is Shirtless (AGAIN!


  • suriajay12
    02-26 08:02 AM
    Yeah! Its common sense dude! Lets keep the 50USD in pocket when one has job rather than contributing to a cause that might help keep the job or makes voice heard when a bad bill comes out.. Choice is yours and your friends. If you/your friends are expecting a GC because you paid 50$ towards this effort, I dont know what to tell. If you/your freinds are expecting to hold xyz accountable for every single penny of the donation, that is not the attitude that will bring US together.

    Ask your friends to understand the word lobbying and advocacy efforts. How much work it takes to hire a firm and get strategic advise? How much a firm that advises strategically and positions the issue strategically charges per hr? If an IT consultant is charged at the rate of 100-200USD by a big consulting company, Imagine how much would a consultant such as these people on the hill charge? I dont know but I wont be surprised if its north of 500USD an hr.

    With out IV, The only two things folks on the hill knew were illegal immigration and H1B visa. Now more than 75% offices know the EB issue inside out and have a position on it. This is an effort that needs to be continued until we get a solution.

    "What is the action plan for FUTURE"?

    Relief from Retrgoression. Continued advocacy efforts. is it that difficult to know? I dont know but it seemed obvious to me.

    Please see my answers in BOLD. Please do not assume I am mad to put in BOLD. This is just to make my point more VISIBLE.

    Yeah! Its common sense dude! Lets keep the 50USD in pocket when one has job rather than contributing to a cause that might help keep the job or makes voice heard when a bad bill comes out.. Choice is yours and your friends. If you/your friends are expecting a GC because you paid 50$ towards this effort, I dont know what to tell. If you/your freinds are expecting to hold xyz accountable for every single penny of the donation, that is not the attitude that will bring US together.

    Ask your friends to understand the word lobbying and advocacy efforts. How much work it takes to hire a firm and get strategic advise? How much a firm that advises strategically and positions the issue strategically charges per hr? If an IT consultant is charged at the rate of 100-200USD by a big consulting company, Imagine how much would a consultant such as these people on the hill charge? I dont know but I wont be surprised if its north of 500USD an hr.
    YOU GOT US WRONG.
    THEIR POINT IS VERY CLEAR TO ME. THEY ARE WILLING TO SPEND MONEY, AND DO KNOW THE COSTS INVOLVED.
    THEY ARE SPENDING CLOSE TO $5000.00 EVERY YEAR FOR 1 YEAR HI-b EXTENSIONS, VISA RENEWALS, EADs extn, APART FROM THE STRESS AND PAIN DUE TO THESE BACKLOGS.We cannot put a number on the pain this has created.
    THEY ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT $10, $50 OR $100. THEY ARE READY TO SPEND EVEN $5000.00 AS I FELT, BUT THEY WANT TO SEE THE ACTION PLAN. YOU CANNOT SAY I WILL WAIT AND WAIT AND THEN WHEN WE NEED TO, WE WILL START A CAMPAIGN AND THAT IN SHORT NOTICE WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GET THAT MONEY. WE UNDERSTAND THAT. BUT OUR QUESTION IS WHAT DID WE DO IN LAST NEARLY 2 YEARS APART FROM VOICING IN 07 FIASCO.


    With out IV, The only two things folks on the hill knew were illegal immigration and H1B visa. Now more than 75% offices know the EB issue inside out and have a position on it. This is an effort that needs to be continued until we get a solution.
    WE UNDERSTAND AND WE WANT TO MAKE IV VERY STRONGER TOO. WE DID RESEARCH MANY SITES AND FINALLY NOTED IV IS ONE OF THE BEST WHERE SO MANY PARTICIPATE (READ AS "GIVE IDEAS, BUT NO ACTION") ALL THE TIME. WE DIDNT SEE ANY OTHER SITE WITH THIS MUCH PARTICIPATION AND HENCE WE WANT TO STICK TO THIS AND COLLABORATE HERE.

    "What is the action plan for FUTURE"?

    Relief from Retrgoression. Continued advocacy efforts. is it that difficult to know? I dont know but it seemed obvious to me.
    WRONG. "RELIEF FROM RETROGRESSION" IS NOT THE ACTION PLAN, THATS ONE OF THE END RESULT. WE NEED TO KNOW ACTION PLAN. LOOK AT THE CURRENT STATE OF HOUSING. WE EXPECT A CAMPAIGN TO TOUCH THE RIGHT PEOPLE TO SEND THE MESSAGE HOW WE CAN HELP IN HOUSING, JOBS. WE OFCORS DO NOT SUPPORT WE GO THEIR WITH IMMIGRATION BANNER AT THIS TIME FOR OBVIOUS REASONS. DONT YOU THINK OBAMA KNOWS IT. NOW DONT COME BACK WITH 20% DOWN PAYMENT. WE NEED TO TELL THEM HOW WE CAN CONTRIBUTE.
    YOU ARE A PHD HOLDER, OR YOU ARE SOMEONE WHO HAS EXPERTISE IN SOMETHING AND CAN CREATE A JOBS. THATS WHAT THE GOVT WANTS TO HEAR. AND HERE YOU ARE NOT EVEN WISPERING..
    AGAIN "RELIEF FROM RETRO" IS JUST ONE OF THE THINGS WE WILL BE FIGHTING FOR,. THERE ARE MANY OTHER ISSUES AND FOR THAT ALSO WE NEED TO CONTRIBUTE IN MUCH SMALLER AMOUNTS EVEN AFTER OUR ISSUING ARE FIXED. THATS COMMUNITY.

    Finally one question to ALL.
    If we see a good action plan from IV Core and a date, how much are you willing to contribute.I am now ready to do $2000.00 instead of $500.00 as I said before. I am not very well-off to do this much (my friends are, though). But this looks to be nothing when compared to the loss many faced waiting 5-10- years. So I will do.
    Feel free. Remember how it feels like if you get it. and dont forget how much you are spending now for different immigration related issues. How much are you ready to contribute to IV.




    2010 hey now, Rick Ross! brad rick ross shirtless. Is Rick Ross sexy to you?
  • Is Rick Ross sexy to you?


  • bigboy007
    05-12 09:48 PM
    Not sure Why IV Core should respond when a category goes off... They are working united for all overall suffering and pain for all categories...

    Hoping to get some direction / response from IV core.. surprisingly quiet CORE grp this time..



    more...

    rick ross shirtless. rick ross
  • rick ross


  • k3GC
    05-23 11:01 AM
    Sent email to 2 state senators + 10 senators listed.




    hair Rick Ross decided it was rick ross shirtless. Freeway Rick D. Ross
  • Freeway Rick D. Ross


  • pcs
    06-25 10:44 PM
    Look at this ad...

    This guy is a bigtime white racist... he does not mind only Canadian TN VISA guys but not the Mexicans...

    Equal opportunity Emp will call for either do not sponsor ANY VISA catagory for people present in US or NO VISA at all... BUT this guys is OK with VISA for Canadian but No Mexican.... forget about H1-B etc... OPT

    PROCESS ENGINEER / CHEMICAL ENGINEER - Petrochemical / Refining / Oil and Gas job in Martinez, CA: Engineering and Engineering careers - Yahoo HotJobs (http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/jobseeker/jobsearch/job_detail.html?job_id=JL84XW2ILFG&source=jobalert)

    I do not need any job but I am going to write to the VP of this company and demand explanation to prove why he be not considered a racist or at least a NON Equal Opportunity Employer



    more...

    rick ross shirtless. Rick Ross covers VIBE
  • Rick Ross covers VIBE


  • walker15
    08-26 05:22 PM
    I think anytime 6 months before the expiry of your current H1B extension.




    hot Rick Ross Vs. Rick Ross rick ross shirtless. Rick Ross Covers Vibe
  • Rick Ross Covers Vibe


  • coopheal
    09-23 05:18 PM
    Excluding dependents is the most powerful and least controversial and most unifying way to clear the entire backlog in 2 - 3 years time. This way no EB2-EB3, I/C/ROW we will all be green.

    Explain how this is the least controversial? Are anti, illegals, and other stake holders willing to do this?



    more...

    house Rick Ross, Meek Mills amp; Swizz rick ross shirtless. Rick Ross! pictures of
  • Rick Ross! pictures of


  • sriteam
    07-10 09:40 AM
    http://www.twincities.com/business/ci_6336222




    tattoo Check out this new Rick Ross rick ross shirtless. and shirtless Rick Ross on
  • and shirtless Rick Ross on


  • mariner5555
    05-01 02:36 PM
    actually the other question is why doesnt Murthy or IV asks the USCIS (whenever they get a chance to meet) ..to give a breakdown of the 485 pending by category by country. one would hope that atleast someone in uscis has access to such reports .. any idea, thoughts ??



    more...

    pictures Rick Ross Is Shirtless (AGAIN! rick ross shirtless. a shirtless Rick Ross.
  • a shirtless Rick Ross.


  • payur
    07-11 10:21 AM
    Way to go !!!!




    dresses Rick Ross Covers Vibe rick ross shirtless. Recap: Rick Ross Hosts Pool
  • Recap: Rick Ross Hosts Pool


  • morchu
    05-08 02:20 PM
    Do you see anywhere in INA mentioning that "EB-dependents should NOT be filed in EB-category". How is it a "mis-interpretation" then?

    Again like I mentioned before you can achive the same goal (which you care about) via a different approach.
    ...the official mis interpretation ...



    more...

    makeup rick ross rick ross shirtless. Rick Ross, Meek Mills amp; Swizz
  • Rick Ross, Meek Mills amp; Swizz


  • Mahatma
    12-20 03:05 PM
    Never make anything a weakness....thats when you will feel you have everything to lose if you don't get it.

    This is one of the very wise and rational answers that I liked. It comprehends the truth of life!




    girlfriend and shirtless Rick Ross on rick ross shirtless. Is Rick Ross sexy to you?
  • Is Rick Ross sexy to you?


  • nousername
    02-02 01:14 PM
    Minimalist....
    First off, do not generalize H1 to IT industry only.. Trust me, Indian are present in other fields also and they are doing well there :)

    Now about your comments, so I guess you truly believe in jungle raj.. Basically, do whatever you think benefits you.. Forget about what other people might need. May be you don't understand the mean of "society" and what makes humans different from animals. Sad, very sad..

    About your example, I hope that does not happen to anyone but if it does then yes the employer should pay for the return flight back home but please do not mix two separate issues.

    Anyway, I do not think I need to waist any more time with you because you fail to understand the underlining issue.

    Good luck with you immigration because that seems to be the focus of your life.

    nousername,If your would-be employer had sponsored the visa,it got selected and then he has to not hire you on Oct1st because of his business not doing so well, what would you do?

    Ideally your employer should rescind your offer and buy you a ticket back home.
    But in the IT industry, that is the reason most people still work with desi employer, even thouh they know that they will be taken advantage of.

    Is it illegal? Yes. But there is a risk for the people involved.

    Also, when someone tries to land H1 for the first time, it is really tough to find an employer who can apply 6 months in advance.Most american companies don't even go through the hassle unless they are hiring for non-IT positions. Then you have companies like Infosys who apply in bunches and keep them ready for the business they are expecting in future. Try and argue with them that they shouldn't do that as many people who have jobs lined up right now will not get H1s.

    In my opinion most people who are on H1 n IT with american companies, either got in there via OPT- H1 or H1 transfer.

    You gotta do what you gotta do. If you keep thinking about all deserving people,you would never take a step forward. At everypoint in life you will have certain options and every option woul cause some or other discomfort. Unless you are involved in clearcut criminal activity, everything else is fair, in my opinion.




    hairstyles Rick Ross covers VIBE rick ross shirtless. quot;Rick Ross has a tattoo of
  • quot;Rick Ross has a tattoo of


  • sledge_hammer
    02-12 04:07 PM
    So you basically want a piece of the discussion no matter you are involved in it or not. The OP asked for advice/opinion, and I had the right to respond because it is �asked�. Whereas you chose not to give your opinion, but just decided you wanted a beef with me, which proves that you have too much time on your hands for things that is not asked of you.

    After page 2, I went after only those who attacked me for being who I am, that is trying to be morally right. And today I went after gvenkat who wanted me to "grow brains", and also asked me if I think the OP should go back home, to which I provided my answer.

    So unless you were totally jobless, you had no business commenting. You only want to be a part of this discussion because somewhere inside you there is a conscience that is very guilty for not being what a person really should be. And what better way to kill that feeling than to shoot down anyone else that wants to hold people responsible morally.

    I understand where you're coming from. And the fact that you are still coming after me proves to me even more how your conscience is eating you from the inside.

    You have reading comprehension issues as well...if you get over yourself then you can comprehend things (let me be clear, I am referring here to my own posts and none of the other ones). You made your point on page 2 about the moral/ethical/legal perils of what the OP has done/proposing to do. You were fine with me. Continuously pointing out at other people as to how morally bankrupt they are (including your latest post) or how bad there comm skills are (written or otherwise) will certainly expose you to shots from others (like me). When you continuously point out others' morals then the presumption here is that you are squeaky clean. I pointed out, you are not. That is all. It does not mean, OPs post is morally/ethically/legally on the right side or I hold that opinion (actually I do not).




    mhb
    07-06 07:50 PM
    Our law firm (Fragomen) actually sent someone directly to Nebraska on Sunday evening to file the docs at the USCIS office there...They filed Monday early AM.
    TSC reached 07/02 @ 10.23pm signed by L. Amrstrong




    dontcareanymore
    07-28 12:48 AM
    1) First of all this is not the response to just the quoted post, but many on the same lines, especially from delax and others.

    2)I believe that that whole process is so screwed up that it is never fair and never will be. Irrespective of what Eb3s hope for and try , Eb2 folks are going to get their GCs and Eb3s will have to wait until stars align for them.

    3) I don't really care one way or other , because what you wish,hope or try to do will have no bearing on the outcome.

    <Those who think 2 year EADs are because of your letters , stay in the dreamland - ignorance is bliss >

    4) I am really happy for Eb2 folks (No way jealous) , just pissed by some attitude here.

    Now that I have the disclaimers out of the way, Here is what I have to say:

    Why the heck you never made the argument that "law is law" and "There is no compassion" before law crap when you were retrogressed ?

    What happened to what law says , when attempts were made to grab visas from ROW with the same "It is not fair" argument ?

    What is the yardstick for EB2 ? It is just what your employer says it is. I know so many in body shops with Eb2 apps while others languish in Eb3 queue.

    You can't extend the logic to all EB1 categories. At least in some of the EB categories one has to have published research work in peer reviewed journals.
    Will give you an example :

    Know some one who came here as postdoc with PHD in life sciences (zoology) and self filed for GC EB1and now runs an Indian grocery just after being in job for less than a year. How do you justify that GC is in the interest of US than a person who is working in a company for 10 years ?



    It is true that the original number is broken up equally among all categories but the INA clearly states that if the demand within a category is not sufficient to use up all the visas in that category then the excess should be made available without any regard to country limit in that category. Here's a fact from the July bulletin - not an opinion:

    There have been questions raised regarding the way numbers have been provided to the China and India in the Employment Second preference categories beginning in April. Section 202(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states that if total demand for visas in an Employment preference category is insufficient to use all available visa numbers in that category in a calendar quarter, then the unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual per-country limit. (For example: If the second preference annual limit were 40,000, number use by “All Other Countries” were estimated to be only 25,000, and the China/India combined number use based on their per-country limits were 6,000, then there would be 9,000 numbers unused. Those 9,000 numbers could then be made available to China and India applicants without regard to their per-country limits.)

    I dont buy the argument that length of wait (as implied in the letter) should determine eligibility for approval disregarding the clear categorization established by law AFTER the initial handout is made on an equal basis. I have always maintained that any logic used to justify shifting visas between EB2 and EB3 purely based on the length of wait can also easily be used between EB2 and EB1. The fact that EB1 has never retrogressed does not matter. Unfortunately LAW is an absolute entity - there is no compassionate interpretation in civil and common law.

    If a EB3-2002 is approved before EB2-2004 purely based on length of wait and ignoring the categorization after the initial handout then the same logic or rationale can be used to approve EB2-2004 before EB1-2007 by 'holding back' the visa from the EB1 candidate and giving it to EB2.

    I dont think either of us is interested in going down the path of EB2 versus EB3 but to the extent this letter implies/attempts to do that, it is detrimental to the functioning of this group. Cheers



    No comments:

    Post a Comment